poniedziałek, 14 lutego 2011

Research: Fight with the shadows

An article published in polish newspaper summarising the impact of Wikileaks on global politics and questioning identity of organisations?/politics?/superpowers? behind Wikileaks.


"(...)According to some commentators and professionals (including journalists, "New York Times") the essence of Wikileaks are not noble, "insiders", stealing from government data networks and databases - and then secretly transferred to the Wiki leaks.  The idea is the ability of hackers to take over the organization's data from the TOR network nodes and creating some kind of secret data bases, where he "hangs up" the traffic in the assumption of a secret and protected. One of the proofs may indicate the number of documents obtained, reaching the millions of pages, collected over the years - highly unlikely that the system did not detect any accesses to such a one-off amount of sensitive data.

The same is true with the secrecy of data - the clauses are not the highest, which is linked to information that has been qualified for transmission over the Internet. These are the most secret separate, nieskomunikowane generał road networks of communication.  Is this kind of project likely to be realized by the group (even the best), hackers in the world for so long? And where are dozens of resources to those subsidiaries and organizational ramifications around the globe from?


In other words, if Wikileaks is that, for what it claims to be, or whether it is for anyone administering public funds and capabilities far in excess of capacity, even the best organized leftist groups of the world's hackers?  Such a force would have to meet several criteria: the struggle for hegemony with the U.S., or at least seek to curb it, to have inexhaustible resources and be able to discreetly pass them.  Have an excellent understanding of the environment the best computer specialists and a global network system.  And to understand that for some people of the West's own civilization is sometimes not acceptable...  Chinese dissidents?  But it may well be a global enthusiasts skillfully uses the knowledge of the rules of common and scattered - their ability to scale is derived from the number of people able to commit to the project.

(...)

Against the West for a decade the Islamic revolt takes place, where the threat (as well as knowledge about who are potential perpetrators) is already well understood.  Wikileaks is perhaps another front against the West, as personified by the United States. This paradoxical state of the art modern war tools. Modernity was so far the main force of the West, it now turns against him.  If this war is the most perplexing problem lies in the fact that I really do not know who is on the other side. "

source: http://tygodnik.onet.pl/31,0,56563,1,artykul.html
translation: Google Translate http://translate.google.com/#pl|en|

Brak komentarzy:

Prześlij komentarz